On May 16, 2012, the US Department of Commerce made an anti-dumping preliminary decision on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells originating in China, and determined that the anti-dumping tax rate of Chinese enterprises was 31.14%-249.96%, and decided to adopt temporary anti-dumping against such products. Measures. Although the US Department of Commerce accepted some of the defense materials submitted by Chinese companies in the ruling, the Chinese PV industry believes that the ruling has distorted the production of China's photovoltaic industry and exports to the United States, which is unfair. To this end, China's photovoltaic industry through the China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Mechanical and Electrical Products made the following statement: First, the competitive advantage of Chinese products has nothing to do with dumping In recent years, China's crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells continue to expand exports to the United States, deeply loved by various American consumers . China's PV companies focus on improving product quality and are committed to technological advancement and innovation; technologies in silicon ingot manufacturing technology, metallurgical grade polysilicon, high-performance battery, SE, ESE, MWT, etc. have reached the international advanced level. China's crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells have a price advantage in the competition. The fundamental reason lies in the agglomeration development of the PV industry chain in China in recent years, the high management level of China's PV companies, the scale of production scale and the forward-looking business strategy. Chinese companies have no and no intention of competing through low prices, including export dumping, and unreasonably plundering the market. The reason why Chinese companies were ruled by the US Department of Commerce for higher dumping margins was mainly because the United States refused to recognize China’s market economy status, turned a blind eye to the fact that Chinese industries operate under market economy conditions, and adopted discriminatory “substitute country†prices. Unfair comparison, thus artificially determining that Chinese companies have dumping, and unreasonably determined the dumping margin of Chinese companies. This practice is not in line with the current situation of China's market economy development, but also highlights the serious tendency of US trade protectionism. 2. The rights and interests of China's responding enterprises have not been fully protected. In this anti-dumping investigation, Chinese responding companies participated in the investigation procedures of the US Department of Commerce in various ways and responded in a positive and cooperative manner. However, we believe that the rights and interests of Chinese responding companies are not fully guaranteed. The US Department of Commerce still uses a discriminatory “substitute country†policy to arbitrarily designate “substitute countries†and, on this basis, determine comparable prices. In the choice of the surrogate country, the scale of the industry, the maturity and the comparability of the industry have not been fully considered. This method ignores the status quo of the Chinese economy and the photovoltaic industry, seriously distorts the production costs of the responding enterprises, and highlights the arbitrary and arbitrary The result is color-oriented, and finally determines the high initial tax rate of the responding company. In this regard, Chinese companies expressed serious dissatisfaction. We believe that if the US Department of Commerce can face the status quo of China's PV industry and determine the normal value of Chinese products fairly and reasonably, Chinese companies will be able to prove that Chinese companies have no dumping behavior with detailed and objective evidence. Third, China's photovoltaic battery exports to the United States have not caused damage to the US related industries. The price of crystalline silicon photovoltaic panels and components in the United States has indeed declined in recent years, but it is not caused by Chinese photovoltaic cells, mainly due to the oversupply of major raw materials - polysilicon prices. The price has dropped. At the same time, thin-film photovoltaic cell competition, US federal and local government demand stimulus policies and financial support, consumer demand, and other alternative energy competition have all led to a decline in the price of crystalline silicon photovoltaic panels and components. SOLARWORD can't represent the US photovoltaic cell industry. According to the Chamber of Commerce of Electrical and Mechanical Industry, the large solar energy manufacturers in the United States and the American Solar Industry Alliance, which represents more than 1,000 manufacturers in the United States, have expressed strong opposition to this preliminary measure. They believe that this preliminary decision is short-sighted and is a serious retrogression of the Obama administration's policy of pursuing clean and renewable energy. Solar products from China have made important contributions to the popularization and promotion of solar products in the US market. Among the approximately 100,000 jobs offered by the US solar industry, SolarWorld provides only about 1,000 jobs, and other jobs are distributed among a large number of US companies and related stakeholders, such as upstream suppliers, downstream distributors, installers, and so on. These industries have expressed strong opposition to the preliminary ruling measures. At the same time, the majority of US users expecting cheap solar products, as well as environmental organizations and climate experts have also expressed their opposition. The Electromechanical Chamber of Commerce has organized 14 companies to actively investigate the damage in this case. We will continue to unite and use strong facts and evidence to show that China's photovoltaic cells have not caused damage to US-related industries. Fourth, the preliminary ruling of anti-dumping duties is not good for people. As China's PV companies pointed out earlier, China's photovoltaic industry has made great contributions to the development of the global photovoltaic energy market. In order to produce crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, China imports more than $2 billion in raw materials such as polysilicon, EVA, and slurry from the United States each year. Chinese manufacturers have imported equipment from the United States in 2010 and paid technology transfer fees of not less than $3 billion. China's exports of photovoltaic cells and components to the United States have also made important contributions to the development of downstream industries in the United States, especially the photovoltaic power generation installation industry. Therefore, if the US government finally implements trade restrictions on China's crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, it will be unfavorable for the development of the global photovoltaic energy market, especially for the United States. Chinese PV companies hope that the US Department of Commerce will correct its incorrect and unfair practices in the next step of the anti-dumping final investigation process, objectively and fairly treat Chinese responding companies and their cooperation and defense, and avoid unreasonable damage to these responding companies. Legal interests. At the same time, Chinese PV companies will also unite and continue to actively, tenaciously and forcefully defend in anti-dumping and countervailing procedures, do their utmost to safeguard their legitimate interests, and will continue to work hard to create a good trade order for the global photovoltaic industry. Together with photovoltaic companies from all over the world, we will promote a brighter future for the global PV industry. The United States announced the results of the PV anti-dumping tax, but the enthusiasm of exhibitors quickly cooled. Atlas Solar Power Technology Co., Ltd., which is quite eye-catching at the exhibition site, has also been greatly affected as the first photovoltaic integrated enterprise in China to land on NASDAQ.
If you`re starting to face problems with your escalators, our modernization solutions will increase their lifespan, giving you the flexibility of replacing the entire installation or just individual components. This will ensure your escalators comply with the latest standards and are as energy efficient, safe, and reliable as possible.
Why modernize with the CEP?
AN INVESTMENT THAT PAYS OFF
CEP modernization improves safety, reliability, accessibility, and visual appearance, and also lowers energy costs.
HAPPIER BUILDING USERS
Working with us will bring you improved reliability, accessibility, and comfort – for the lifetime of your building.
A HASSLE-FREE INSTALLATION PROCESS
Our professionally managed modernization process minimizes disturbance to tenants and visitors.
Full Escalator Replacement,Public Transport Escalators,Indoor Commercial Escalators,Outdoor Commercial Escalators
CEP Elevator Products ( China ) Co., Ltd. , https://www.zjelevatordoorsystem.com