According to the World Trade Organization's ruling, in the anti-dumping investigation conducted by the United States in the United States to send warm water shrimp and diamond saw blades, the original calculation of dumping margins did not comply with WTO rules, and China won the case in this case. This news has brought good news to China's export diamond saw blade companies, especially the diamond saw blade enterprise of Jiang Danyang, China's diamond saw blade export base. This is a rare victory in the history of China’s anti-dumping against the United States in recent years. China's exports of American diamond saw blades will be subject to a 164% anti-dumping duty to 0% without damage final. Chinese export companies have long breathed a sigh of relief in the global international trade market. How did this rare anti-dumping victory case be obtained, from 164% to 0%, and what did it give us? Let's take a brief look at the process: On May 3, 2005, US companies quoted the country's customs statistics as saying that the export of diamond saw blades from China and South Korea increased from 8.7 million in 2002 to 13.4 million in 2004. As a result, American companies failed to enjoy the benefits brought by the construction industry boom. On the contrary, they reduced the profit margin of American companies, resulting in the bankruptcy of one company, the market share of many companies narrowed, and the US counterparts were “covered in steel and energy costs. The embarrassing situation of rising and falling product prices, the increase in low-cost imported diamond circular saw blades from China has caused substantial damage to US domestic industries. The American Diamond Saw Blade Manufacturers Union filed an indictment with the US Department of Commerce, alleging that diamond saw blades from China and South Korea were dumped in the United States and required an anti-dumping investigation. On May 16, 2006, the US Department of Commerce initially determined that the dumping margin of Chinese enterprises was 2.50%~164.09%. The US Department of Commerce made a decision to impose anti-dumping duties of 2.5% to 164.09% on Chinese enterprises, which means that China will export in the future. All diamond saw blades in the United States may be subject to a punitive tariff of no less than 200%. After more than a year of repeated contests, on June 19, 2006, four of the six members of the US International Trade Commission believed that the Chinese diamond saw blade did not cause substantial damage to the US domestic industry and no longer imposed anti-dumping duties. China's export of American diamond saw blades will reduce the anti-dumping duty of 164.09% from the beginning to a weighted average tax rate of 14.9%, and finally obtain the best result of the anti-dumping duty "return to zero". On February 28, 2011, the Chinese government slammed the US government's “zeroing†approach to the anti-dumping case against Chinese warm water shrimp to the WTO. On July 22, the Chinese side proposed a supplementary consultation request to include the “return to zero†in the anti-dumping measures taken by the US diamond saw blades. This time, the WTO ruled that it provided a successful case for the United States to completely "zero" the diamond saw blade "return to zero" method. From the victory of the anti-dumping case against the US diamond saw blade, we can get the following revelations: one of the revelations: the role of the government department is huge. At the beginning of the case, the Ministry of Commerce will promptly transfer relevant information to the relevant export enterprises, so that the enterprise In the shortest possible time, the Ministry of Commerce actively assisted exporting companies to negotiate with the US Department of Commerce in order to win more opportunities to win anti-dumping cases. Under the intervention of the Chinese government, the United States In February 2006, the Ministry of Commerce sent relevant personnel to China for on-site inspection. At the same time, the local government departments also actively responded. China’s diamond saw blade export base Jiang Danyang’s Municipal Bureau of Commerce issued an urgent appeal to the 10 enterprises involved in the case and foreign trade companies in the first time, requiring all enterprises involved to participate in the response, and at the same time Through the industry chamber of commerce, experienced anti-dumping lawyers are invited to provide training to relevant enterprises, and some funds are used to subsidize enterprises. These acts undoubtedly add a heavy weight to our export enterprises to win this lawsuit. Enlightenment 2: Industry associations cannot ignore the fact that industry associations have also played a huge role in the process of responding to organizations outside the organization. A company tends to be weak, and practice has proved that it is very difficult to deal with it alone by responding to foreign anti-dumping. The cost is huge. Chambers of Commerce can play a part in the strength and wisdom of the group and twist into a rope to jointly cope with the difficulties. After the US company filed a lawsuit on May 3, 2005, China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Mechanical and Electrical Products quickly responded. On May 11th, it held a response meeting in Shanghai, China Stone Industry Association and other related organizations and legal circles. Experts, as well as dozens of diamond saw blades companies and foreign trade companies to conduct repeated consultations, study the US indictment, find a breakthrough in the case, and enhance the confidence of China's export enterprises to win this lawsuit. Enlightenment 3: Solidarity and cooperation in the overall anti-dumping is aimed at a variety of varieties, not a business. Therefore, the most taboo of the enterprises involved is to give up automatically, and to suspend the enterprises based on the materials they have mastered. The ruling will be made soon, and it will be defeated. If everyone can work together and respond collectively, it will not only greatly reduce the funding of litigation, but also exert the overall strength. The Chinese enterprises were able to win this anti-dumping case, and the alliance of many enterprises played a huge role. The Danyang Huachang Company, which first heard of this, quickly organized local Fengtai, Youhe, and Lectra. The saw blade company took the lead in setting up the country's first "anti-dumping response team for the saw blade industry", and at the same time actively joined forces with the national giant diamond saw blade production giants such as Antai, Boshen and Qikai to jointly respond to US anti-dumping pressures in 2006. At the Canton Fair for half a year, Jiangsu Huachang Company held relevant forms printed by the Ministry of Commerce, and appealed to more enterprises to participate in the appeal. The number of enterprises that participated in the collective response to the lawsuit increased to 12, which played a good role in group operations. It laid a good foundation for the final victory. Revelation 4: Professional guidance to force anti-dumping investigations can be said to be more complicated cases in international litigation. A company sometimes has hundreds of pages of content when answering questionnaires. Therefore, companies need to be fully and carefully prepared to answer accurately within a limited time. It is best to ask professionals, especially those with rich knowledge of international trade law. For example, several companies in Jiangdanyang have joined forces to hire professional lawyers from Beijing Sega Law Firm with anti-dumping lawsuit experience. Although exporting companies have rich international trade and production and processing capabilities, they sometimes have no way to fight against these international trade lawsuits. The addition of professionals to make up for their shortcomings is one of the important factors in the final victory. Since joining the WTO, while China's foreign trade environment has improved overall, the trade friction against China has become increasingly prominent, showing a trend of continuous warming. In recent years, China has become the hardest hit by anti-dumping. This time our diamond saw blade company responded to victory, once again proved: as long as our government and industry associations fully play their role, the company takes it seriously, responds positively, and entrusts lawyers with anti-dumping response to rich experience in the international economic situation. Under more severe circumstances, it can also win the victory of foreign anti-dumping investigations.
Single Bowl Handmade Kitchen Sink
Single Bowl Handmade Kitchen Sink,Single Bowl Kitchen Sink,Large Single Bowl Kitchen Sink,Single Bowl Sink
Zhongshanshi JiaBaoLu Kitchen And Bathroom Products Co., Ltd , https://www.gabalusink.com